This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

JavaScript Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Push Notification was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 October 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Push technology. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Archives

Archive 1

Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...

Collaboration...

If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.

Where to list JavaScript articles

We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list.

User scripts

The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!

If you have need for a user script that does not yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.

How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention

If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.

Rating JavaScript articles

At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article. Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Push technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080417004248/http://victor.transformadora.com/Oreilly/wdesign/xhtml/ch13_03.htm to http://victor.transformadora.com/Oreilly/wdesign/xhtml/ch13_03.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318013327/http://operawatch.com/news/2006/09/opera-takes-the-lead-with-ajax-support-among-browsers-more-efficient-streaming.html to http://operawatch.com/news/2006/09/opera-takes-the-lead-with-ajax-support-among-browsers-more-efficient-streaming.html
• Added ((dead link)) tag to http://ajaxpatterns.org/HTTP_Streaming

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Under Push_technology#Push_notification it is claimed that "[p]ush notifications were first introduced by Apple in 2009". While the cited source does describe how Apple introduced push notifications, it certainly does not say they were first to do it, which of course they weren't. Maybe the intent of that sentence was just to describe when Apple did it the first time, however for me the sentence reads as if "Apple was the first to introduce push notifications". I'd say it should be rewritten accordingly. Thoughts? --Arny (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixed in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Push_technology&oldid=1183161848 ACaseOfWednesdays (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To a layman push technology is an obscure term for an obscure subject. You explain it by using other obscure terms unfamiliar to non-computer nerds. You need to do better. 96.241.18.134 (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]