River Frome, Bristol has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 7, 2009 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Bristol Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. More information: /  At least one photograph is included in this article This article has a map This article has an infobox

This review is transcluded from Talk:River Frome, Bristol/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let's go. Inevitably there are some quibbles.

• Image check - images appropriate with no copyright issues, good alt text present
• Ref check You do not need retrieval dates for on-line versions of "real" books or journals, such as the hydrographic register or the EA publications since the content will not change. Ref 18 to an online tertiary source is not RS; however, the site helpfully gives the original refe which you should use instead

OK all fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Technical check Bristolian is a Dab page. All links OK

The Dab page does have the text: A native of Bristol, would you prefer I unliked this? Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Why is floating harbour capitalised - it's lower case in the linked article?

That is how it is referred to by the City Council and others in Bristol as per [1]. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• In "Course", is it possible to have some variation on "joined"?

Fixed Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't like the very short sections which don't appear to fit any obvious plan. I'd merge Etymology with History, and both Navigation and Tributaries with Course

Fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• ... the river drops nearly 50 ft, and as a result there were a number of corn and other mills. needs metric units, and clarification of the link between the drop and mills being present
• Today a wheel at Snuff Mills survives, and the mill buildings of Cleeve Mill survive as a private residence two "survives"

Fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• is a 29 kilometre public path needs Imperial. Since this section is so short, why not list the local authorities, wildlife organisations etc?

Fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Tributaries -pointless duplication of Course

Removed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I made these changes. Please check

I have no quibbles with those. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done for now, I'll have another read later Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have addressed your concerns as per above. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For Bristolian, I'd be inclined to link to the city, since the alternative would be a one sentence stub Bristolian (person). I've no other concerns, so here we go

GA review
(see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Thanks for the review. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on River Frome, Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520093452/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Environment-Planning/Pollution/bristol-living-rivers--watercourses.en?page=8 to http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Environment-Planning/Pollution/bristol-living-rivers--watercourses.en?page=8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A large number of people witnessed an otter in the Frome in December 2020 - but I have no references to prove this. I have poor quality video and photos though. Perhaps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jezhotwells would like to comment on whether the presence of an otter should be added to this section.

Chris.Bristol 01:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]