This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
That looks fine. Thanks. It is a pity that we haven't any images from some of the more iconic locations on the river; Tregaron Bog, Henllan rapids, Cenarth falls, Cilgerran gorge etc. Regards VelellaVelella Talk 19:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on River Teifi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
According to a comment in Talk:River Dyfi by User:Gareth the River Teifi has historically been anglicised as 'Tivy'. However, there is currently no mention of this in the article. This led me to search for it on Google and I found it used in this photo from c.1955[1] and in this article on Wiktionary. I have created a redirect in case anyone searches for the Teifi by the name 'River Tivy' which is the usual procedure for former anglicisms on Wikipedia e.g. 'Portmadoc' redirects to Porthmadog. As for the question of how or where this could be best mentioned in this article the River Conwy has 'River Conway' mentioned in its introduction but this could be mentioned in the History section given it is a historical name. Tk420 (talk) 20:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On Google most of the search results I get for 'River Tivy' are for the Teifi though I have only checked after I created the redirect on Wikipedia. The Tivy article on Wiktionary was created in 2017 by User:Pingku. I did also find the 'River Tivy' in a poem by Michael Drayton (1563-1631)[2] but Wikipedia did not let me use a link to a more presentable site in my last comment. I know for a thing the English-language did not have a standardised spelling system in the Tudor and Stuart eras and translation errors were common especially before modern press printing so the anglicised 'Tivy' could have come about this way. Where the official anglicisms were dropped this mainly happened in the late 20th century though I am not sure of the exact date or if the name of a river has changed instantly. Tk420 (talk) 21:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The river is mentioned as being subject to flooding. Pretty much all rivers will display that characteristic - is that of note then? And 'the last took place in 2015' - writing this now in 2020 I'd imagine some took place earlier this year too. Notable floods may be worth recording, not least if they resulted in long-term changes/consequences. Might it be better to deal with flooding in a different way? cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your observation. In my opinion, the whole paragraph beginning, The river is susceptible to flooding and there were some heavy floods in 2007 and 2008 ... should be removed. Only events that are either unique or of lasting importance need to included. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The length of the Usk is given in its article as 78 miles / 125km which exceeds the figures presented here, thereby suggesting the Usk is the longest river wholly in Wales. The figure is sourced to Natural Resources Wales who are responsible for its management and so may be expected to know what they are talking about. That said, distances provided for rivers are notoriously variable - not just these two. cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've measured the Teifi, Tywi and Usk myself with the last of them coming out at 133km! I'm fairly confident about these figures having used the 'wheresthepath website to do so in excruciating detail. This is of course original research on my part so cannot be included in any of the articles but it does give me a better feel for the extent of the measurement problem. We come back to the old issues of different parties having adopted different means of measuring them (string, physical map measurers, digital means etc), at different times (meander loops being cut off, channels artificially altered etc) and with different definitions of their mouths (often the authority boundary which may have changed). If authorities can't even agree which is the world's longest river then what hope for some lesser known ones in a quiet corner of NW Europe? cheers Geopersona (talk) 13:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]