Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, I re-reviewed all four Sailor Moon character articles on the sweeps list (this artice plus Sailor Mars, Sailor Mercury to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that all the articles don't meet current criteria, basically for the same reasons (which is why I'm bundling them here.)

• First off there appears to be a reliance on primary sources for large segments of the article, and the way they are phrased suggest that it is original research. (The most obvious examples of this are in Sailor Jupiter, where "However, unlike these delinquent girls, her curly hair is natural." is cited to "In her first manga appearance, a teacher questions her about her hair."
• There is also excessive use of nonfree images throughout. For example, in Sailor Mercury, File:Mercury-21.jpg, File:Amimanga.jpg, and File:DarkAmi.PNG are all redundant with the use of File:Sailor Merkur 01.jpg and do not meet WP:NFCC.
• Finally, I do not feel that these articles meet the "broadness" criteria, in that it does not address a main aspect of each character; the reception. The only sources in all four articles are to fan polls, which are highly unreliable given we know nothing about them and do not even prove the notability of each character. This is a serious hole in coverage, and given the above issues combined, I am boldly delisting all four. Remember that you can renominate the articles at WP:GAN any time you feel it meets criteria, but I would strongly urge you to trim the article's in-universe content and add more secondary sources first. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 23:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]