This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business: Accounting High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Accounting task force. Finance & Investment High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2013 2014 2015

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Corporation#Financial disclosure|disclosure]] The anchor (#Financial disclosure) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

There is virtually nothing about the history. The adoption of the main rule, SEC Rule 10b-18, is not explained. Why was it adopted? The situation before that is never discussed.

The only hint of history is the first paragraph under "Economic impact", which is confusing.

Share repurchases have been critically evaluated since the 1970's but after 1982, the Securities and Exchange Commission largely condoned them. At that time, the agency already ascertained "that a large volume of stock buybacks would manipulate the market". Only when Rule 10b-18 was implemented in the US, stock repurchases were seen as "virtually unregulated".

What does "critically evaluated" mean? (Be specific.) How does that differ from "largely condoned"? What changed in 1982 about the legal situation, aside from having a rule? What is the source of the quoted material? (And why is this vague history misclassified?) Zaslav (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]