This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skepticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Epistemology / Ethics / Religion / Contemporary High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Metaphysics Epistemology Ethics Philosophy of religion Contemporary philosophy Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Atheism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page. Quick help Project's main talk page Article layout Links to atheism-related information · List of free online resources Writing about religion · Article development Citing sources · Verifying sources · About original research Assume good faith · Be civil Recent activity Core articles the "Atheism" article Articles recently added to Category:Atheism To do edit history watch purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold. Add a userbox to your page (((User WikiProject Atheism)) or ((User WPA2))) and attract potential members. Help with articles. See this month's adopt-an-article. Help out with this to-do list. Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles). Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use ((WikiProject Atheism)) or see info box) Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it. Maintenance, etc. Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references). Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process). Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly. Always write for an encyclopedia. Articles to improve Agnosticism Create Articles on notable atheists Expand an atheism stub Immediate attention State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments. False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes. Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century. Skepticism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2024/January

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

In my Master's degree studies, I've come across a book article that mentions "sceptic" is typically reserved for those who doubt information because of their beliefs, which is the opposite of skeptic that doubt commonly held values until good evidence is supplied.

It seems that there needs to be a strong distinction described in this article that differentiates between skeptics and those who are science deniers or disbelieve evidence that is presented to them because of their beliefs, i.e. sceptics. Leitmotiv (talk) 04:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leitmotiv and thanks for raising this point. As far as I'm aware, the two terms are used as synonyms with the difference being English variant, see [1], [2], and [3]. It's possible that some theorists distinguish them but this may not be standard. I don't think that the main sources used in the article discuss this distinction. If you have a reliable source, we could add a footnote. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the book article again. Not surprising since I have like 5 articles to read per class. But it may be that sceptic as a denier is not universal, and it may just be better to mention denier instead. A lot of folks think "skeptic" is a denier and a small statement noting the difference would be handy. Leitmotiv (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel comfortable about adding a statement if we cannot present a good source to support it. After a short look, I found the following, which states that this distinction is a misconception. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]