This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance). Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Websites: Computing Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I just checked, and it seems that sourceforge.net is online, and fully functional. I think the Current Status section should either be removed, or updated to reflect the site's current online status. Darkinin (talk) 01:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Their own blog (http://sourceforge.net/blog) says that there are some major services not yet restored. I don't have a position on what the article should say, but "fully functional" is not correct. DMacks (talk) 03:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Several years later, SourceForge still displays:"The sourceforge.net website is temporarily in static offline mode. Only a very limited set of project pages are available until the main website returns to service." Santamoly (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Santamoly: Sourceforge has been experiencing recent DDOS attacks and other problems, including a major outage for the past few days (starting February 27/28). This is a completely new problem and not, as you put it, "several years later" the same problem. This problem may however be related to a major hardware/power incident from September 2017 which fried a lot of hardware. Furthermore, Sourceforge was bought by a new owner (BizX) in January 2016 and has been executing a series of major policy, software, and hardware changes ever since. Read the following for more information:

• https://twitter.com/sfnet_ops/status/969743281922936832
• http://www.i-programmer.info/news/136-open-source/9430-does-sourceforge-have-a-future.html
• https://opensource.com/business/16/3/when-selling-site-means-selling-community-part-2
• https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/4n3e1s/the_state_of_sourceforge_since_its_acquisition_in/
• https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/27/faulty_data_center_takes_out_sourceforge/

172.88.134.103 (talk) 14:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SourceForge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150603170625/http://ir.corp.sourceforge.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=82629&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1260642&highlight= to http://ir.corp.sourceforge.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=82629&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1260642&highlight=
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011203709/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2119983/china-asta-la-vista-altavista to http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2119983/china-asta-la-vista-altavista

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SourceForge's logo has apparently changed. The logo here is outdated. TheDaJakester^Talk 20:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a disaster. There's even an entire section of, from what I can see, specialist technobabble seemingly irrelevant to the rest of the article. What is this, why is it included, and what does it mean?

Simplifying a little, the SPF record for a domain is intended to identify those public IP addresses which are permitted to send mail for a domain.

As at August 2018 the SPF DNS TXT record for 'sourceforge.net' redirects to that for '_spf.sourceforge.net' which is

"v=spf1 ip4:172.16.0.0/12 ip4:216.105.38.0/26 -all"

The CIDR block 172.16.0.0/12 is reserved by IANA in RFC1918 for local private use, and thus has no place in any SPF record.

Oecology (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• SourceForge Homepage.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• SourceForge Homepage.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]