This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: ((WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=)) ((WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=)) Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force United States: South Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina.

Can't someone make a shorter title

• Not really. The document that's the subject of the article may have a long title, but that is its title. What else would you call it? MK2 (talk) 18:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We could. We use "Ordinance of Secession", which is an abbreviation of the full title, albeit one that has more currency than any abbreviation for this declaration. Names like "South Carolina Declaration of Causes of Secession" are used in some sources.

Alternatively we could re-title this article to more broadly cover SC's secession convention, including the Ordinance, the Declaration, the people they sent to negotiate federal property, and whatnot. —Mrwojo (talk) 02:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Declaration of Immediate Causes" or some such might work. I agree that the title is incredibly and unnecessarily long. Referring to the "official" name within the article is fine. Red Harvest (talk) 22:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple changes that I think were justified by the actual text of the declaration. I clarified that the text itslef centered more around Constitutional provisions than the Fugitive Slave Act (which was simply an act of Congress upholding the Constitutional requirement).

Also, the paragraph on states' rights seemed misleading and biased. I hope my revision isn't seen as distorting anything. I tried to summarize the argument made in the declaration itself. I don't see anywhere in the declaration that actually complains that the federal government failed to compel states to return slaves. I also don't see an explicit contradiction in the text. Primarily it states that the Constitution was a compact among sovereign states. That compact required certain things of the states. The northern states failed to fulfill their obligations, so SC was reclaiming its sovereignty by withdrawing from the compact.

I think the wording of the paragraphs is still a little clumsy and could stand some more revision. But overall, I think my revision more accurately explains the actual text of the declaration than did the original.

Pilby (talk) 23:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A major weakness of this article is that the text of the actual document is not in it or directly linked. A synopsis is fine, but this sort of document is short enough to be attached in some fashion. A few quotes to illustrate/reinforce the synopsis would likely help as well. Red Harvest (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added some quotes from the text into the article. Hope this helps. Regards, Illegitimate Barrister 04:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]