GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 02:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

 Done Chompy Ace 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per WP:NOTBROKEN and consistent with Episodes VII and IX. Chompy Ace 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 21:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

 Done Chompy Ace 22:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 21:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

 Done Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
minus Replaced with the BFI. Chompy Ace 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 21:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Development

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done reworded Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Writing

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casting

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filming

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed per Special:MobileDiff/1007271016 Chompy Ace 23:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done reworded Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't spot a change so this still feels misleading. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 00:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed per Special:MobileDiff/1007271016 Chompy Ace 02:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed "Kennedy later said filming would begin in January 2016.[7]" sentence Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed removed date Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 20:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Music

 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 22:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release

minus Replaced with Los Angeles Daily News Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing

 Done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Home media

 Already done Chompy Ace 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Box office

 Done Chompy Ace 23:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 23:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
United States and Canada
 Done Chompy Ace 23:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 23:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Other countries
 Done Chompy Ace 02:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed Chompy Ace 02:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed Chompy Ace 02:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 02:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed added pre-existing reference Chompy Ace 02:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 19:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response

 Done Chompy Ace 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Audience reception

 Done Chompy Ace 01:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 01:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done have reduced to one or two citations, and one from the first sentence in this section is converted into a bundle Chompy Ace 08:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See here and here. I restored the refs, but I bundled them. See WP:CITEBUNDLE and WP:Citation overkill. I think the reviewer meant WP:Citation overkill, not WP:OVERLINK. WP:OVERLINK isn't about refs. The refs aren't redundant. They are there so that that the sentences are fully verified. If we say "several reviewers" and only have one reviewer supporting the sentence, that leaves the sentence somewhat unverified. There's also a WP:Hidden note in the section showing that the section was crafted after a lot of discussion. ReaperRoe (talk) 18:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
However, there are now duplicate citations to the same source. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 18:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What duplicates? We're allowed to use the same ref more than once. That's what WP:REFNAME is for. And it's fine for us to use a ref both in a bundle and on its own. ReaperRoe (talk) 19:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done Chompy Ace 20:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying that the same reference is listed more than once (you can find the citation from Ian Youngs in #References five times). You can simply fix this with a better cite bundle using something like <ref name="Youngs"/> multiple times. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 20:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades

 Done Chompy Ace 02:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
minus Replaced with Los Angeles Times Chompy Ace 01:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
minus Replaced with Entertainment Weekly Chompy Ace 06:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 20:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel

 Already done Chompy Ace 06:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

 Done Chompy Ace 21:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 06:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 08:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 08:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 08:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done reference had been removed (See #Critical response) Chompy Ace 10:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done as The Observer was removed due to its tabloid format Chompy Ace 01:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 10:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 01:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done removed per Special:MobileDiff/1007271016 Chompy Ace 06:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed Chompy Ace 06:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progess

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·