Computing: CompSci Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with ((WikiProject Computer science))

I notice that there's a proposal since october 2012 to merge this article with Stream (computer science). I also notice that Stream (computer science) actually redirects to Stream (type theory), which is itself a stub article.

I think it would probably be best to re-format this article with a sub heading containing the information from Stream (type theory) (thus merging that page into this one), redirect this page, Stream (computing), to Stream (computer science), and have Stream (computer science) as the canonical location for both sets of information.

Does anybody else have an opinion on this? I'm not a very prolific wikipedia editor, and a move like that might be a bit much for me to just undertake all on my lonesome --Kiirani (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agree Pintoch (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is the topic of this article? This is looking a lot like a disambiguation page. We already have Stream (disambiguation). --Kvng (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article is a broad-concept article, similar to other broad-concept articles such as Rugby union in the British Isles, Finance minister, National Trust, and various others. Per ((Dabconcept)), it shouldn't be merged to a disambiguation page. --Hirsutism (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]