Note page renames to related pages[edit]

I renamed two related pages:

to make these terms consistent (denoting an object rather than process) and because there were objections on the encapsulation talk page that pharmacology has a related, but distinct scope of concern. MaxEnt (talk) 22:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

,NJ,N,JKKLHJI RAMDAS N.GAVHANE- 

 ITS A GOOD PLATFORM FOR EVERYBODY  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.51.241 (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Added a rating[edit]

The article has no sources, so it is obviously stub class. The complete lack of sources for such a fundamental concern is an embarrassement, so I rated it high importance just to get this fixed. MaxEnt (talk) 22:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd say that even if the article were in good shape, it would count as high importance, because tablets are one of the major drug dosage forms. --Slashme (talk) 06:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Invention of them[edit]

Were pills, tablets, any kind of medicine you swallow without tasting, made that way so you wouldn't have to chew or drink them? I heard that liquid medicines and medicines you injested and had to taste in the process were considered so bad tasting that even sick people would say they were well again so they wouldn't have to take it again. This way you don't have to 66.189.38.7 (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In general, if a medicine actually works, it's a good idea that it be easy to take so that people will not avoid taking it; see compliance (medicine) for a full discussion. However, if a medicine is only effective because the patient believes that it works (see placebo) it's good to make it taste strong, so that the patients are very aware that they have been treated! As you say, an unpleasant treatment may also discourage malingering.--Slashme (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Richard Francis Burton impersonated a doctor during his pilgrimage to Mecca, and gave the following advice to people who wanted to do the same:

Whatever you prescribe must be solid and material, and if you accompany it with something painful, such as rubbing to scarification with a horse-brush, so much the better. Easterns, like our peasants in Europe, wish the doctor to “give them the value of their money.” Besides which, rough measures act beneficially upon their imagination. So the Hakim of the King of Persia cured fevers by the bastinado; patients are beneficially baked in a bread-oven at Baghdad; and an Egyptian at Alexandria, whose quartan resisted the strongest appliances of European physic, was effectually healed by the actual cautery, which a certain Arab Shaykh applied to the crown of his head.

--Slashme (talk) 06:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It holds true today also? Have you ever chewed a non-chewable pill? Perhaps before you learned how to swallow pills? It tastes horrible and bitter as hell The snare (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, some of them are (e.g. acetaminophen, quinine (ugh), cortisone) and some aren't (e.g. calcium supplements, vit. E pills etc.) and some are just plain nasty, without being bitter (Ever tried chewing a multivitamin softgel? It's an experience I would recommend to all the masochists out there). -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slashme (talk • contribs) 10:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Content merged from Talk:Tablet and dose preparation, pharmaceutical preparation[edit]

This article is part of a student project on Downstream_processing. Please do not edit until after December 14, 2006. Thank you.Emk39 20:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Elaine, I read your article -- it's very well written and flows nicely. One thing is that there are no internal links in the article right now. I don't know if you just didn't put them in yet but they would be useful with some of the terms in your article. Also, there is an error with the heading of "table properties," it appears twice. Also, references need to be added to the article. Besides these technical types of corrections, the paper is very well done.


Priya Shoor 20:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hey Elaine, I read your article too. I agree with what Priya said, it is very well done. I sent you an e-mail with a word document with my corrections. I hope it is helpful.

Evjammin 07:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hey, I like the way you segmented your article, makes it easier to follow. I also agree with the previous comments about maybe adding a few internal links. Overall, it flowed very well and it seems like you addressed the main points of your topic without getting too wordy about it. Very well written :) -Avani

Snickerr291 19:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hey Elaine - I like your article. I think that you remove the intro section and have it come before the categories part (that way people can read a little about the article before going more in depth). Also, you might want to add websites that are related to you site (possibly drug companies) or something like (read it over): http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3433

ReginaSophia 21:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi Everyone! Thank you so much for your reviews and I took all of them into consideration I tried to add as much as I can, but I really wanted to add more mathematical problems and examples but they some are really difficult to find. I would like to keep expanding this article as I find more information that would be usefull to the overall down-stream processing information on wikipedia. I also want everyone who is willing and has the information to contribute to this article. Emk39 04:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tablet Coating[edit]

I just moved this section to the end of the article where it belongs--7amada'sback:) (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What's the difference between "tablet" and "pill"?[edit]

This article and the pill (pharmacy) one indicate that pill and tablet are not the same thing. Well, what's the difference? 76.24.104.52 (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

-- A tablet is made by compressing a powder into the final unit. Pills are made by making a paste or dough and cutting (think cookie cutter) it up into blobs that will be the final unit. --Elijah (talk) 04:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For what it's worth, colloquially, both are frequently called "pills". 71.58.112.179 (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved by Breawycker. Jafeluv (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

– There is no primary topic. My dictionary gives stone, clay, or wood tablet as the first definition; the shape, typically the dosing form as the second; and the writing pad or tablet computer as the third. In 2011, all three of these seem to be likely uses. Consistent with Capsule (pharmacy). Pnm (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Revert of recent additions[edit]

I have reverted the recent additions made Sept 16 through Sept 20, 2012 for several reasons: 1) much of the text suffers from absence of context, making the meaning unclear at times, 2) much of it is formatted as an outline with sentence fragments that don't constitute coherent prose, 3) it is highly technical overly detailed at times, which is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article, 4) it is entirely unreferenced, and 5) as noted by another editor, it is possibly plagiarized (cut-and-pasted from elsewhere). If anyone would like to recover some of the content I have removed and incorporate it into the article in a coherent way, please feel free to do so - the content is still available in the article history. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Pill[edit]

@McGeddon: & @Johnbod: The use of colloquialism in a scientific article is not acceptable because people all around the world have various colloquialisms regarding various medication. Insisting that one word is colloquial for a medication above all is biased and that's why it ought to be removed. Unless a citation is provided that 'The Pill' actually refers to contraceptive pill by majority of usage, then it will have to be removed to avoid confusing. Just so you are aware, 'The Pill' can refer to any medication that applies to a certain group; e.g. LGBT individuals might refer 'The Pill' as antiretrovial medication; women might refer 'The Pill' as contraceptive. Because of its generic usage, it is not appropriate to include a colloquialism for it here. Thereof. Vormeph (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So long as the caption isn't confusing to somebody who's never heard of it, it seems quite informative to the reader to mention that a particular style of tablet gained the nickname (even if only for a few decades and in a few countries) of "the pill". --McGeddon (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@McGeddon: Much like drugs have nicknames, so can meds; but in all entirey the image itself is irrelevant because the article is about tablets in general, not a particular type of tablet. I can still remove it based on that criteria. The image caption has to be genericised or removed entirely.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vormeph (talk • contribs) 14:21, 12 February 2016‎
The image is illustrating a paragraph of the article which discusses pills, in a section about types of tablets. If you think the entire section is wrong or off-topic, fair enough, but so long as it's there there's no reason not to illustrate it. --McGeddon (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed. Johnbod (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@McGeddon: & @Johnbod: To be honest with you, the [Pill]] article is really redundant and should best be dedicated a section within the Tablet article. Regardless of nick-names, since they were called hither since the 1960s I have to challenge whether such a colloquialism is still current. Indeed, it is a generation thing and time's are changing. Thus I think we ought to consider merging the [Pill]] article with the Tablet article. If you do that, the image can stay but the caption will have to be discriminated such that it does not sanction colloquialism over the correct medical terms. I am not against colloquialism, but this is not the article to advance such language. Vormeph (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Probably a good idea, as Pill (pharmacy) is a very short article with an inappropriate tangent about "sensory and communication elements", which could be dropped - do you want to propose a formal WP:MERGE discussion? --McGeddon (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

February 2016 merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. Chhandama (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@McGeddon:, @Johnbod: et al; BE IT PROPOSED that the article Pill be considered for a merger with the Tablet article. The reasons are that the Pill article lacks enough substance to have merit as a verifiable article and that its relationship with Tablet is so similar that the Pill article should instead have its own section. Indeed, this will also clear up ambiguity over the image and image caption of pills on the Tablet article which has roused the attention of various contributors. Vormeph (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

What about mini tablets?[edit]

They are now not mentioned. http://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/190921-Minitablets-Manufacturing-Characterization-Methods-and-Future-Opportunities/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432019

ee1518 (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tablet (pharmacy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Table[edit]

Hi 2405:205:110A:F7AE:0:0:2A92:58B0 (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2023[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 January 2023 and 30 June 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aharris13 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by JustinxLane (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The name of a pill.[edit]

What is the name of this pill the number on it is 610? 75.185.246.227 (talk) 23:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories