This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Media This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Mackay Radio Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Occupations (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Should we change this to reflect "talent management" instead?

Lotsofissues 03:16, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This whole thing kind of reads like a "how to" guide rather than an encyclopedic article. Maybe it needs a do over?--125.238.38.59 11:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you ask me, I really don't mind the whole "how to" format. Yes, there are other sites out there with similar guides, but what's the harm in leaving it like this? --71.102.133.171 (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is, at is essence, not at all encyclopedic. It's a "how to", which, while being useful, is not the intended use for a page such as this. It needs to be heavily edited, if not rewritten from scratch. I fixed the cats/spelling/lists for anyone who wants to take a crack at rewriting it using the current information in part.

Anyone not agree on this point?

--71.254.175.12 (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to point out that a lot of this artice is copied word for word from the references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.230.48.34 (talk) 18:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Talent manager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090115173626/http://www.musicbizadvice.com/qa_how_much_does_the_average_concert_promoter_make_per_year_and_how_hard_is_the_course_of_study.htm to http://www.musicbizadvice.com/qa_how_much_does_the_average_concert_promoter_make_per_year_and_how_hard_is_the_course_of_study.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]