This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War I / World War II / Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military land vehicles task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force European military history task force German military history task force World War I task force World War II task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

I think most parts of this aritcle must be rewriten, because they are simply copy & pasted from other articles (e.g. the "Euro-Leopard"/"Global-Leopard" part is from the Leopard 2 article). -- User:Tim.vogt 18:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Likewise the World War I section, much of it found heer. --Pete (talk) 23:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The WWI section is appalling. Badly written, misinformed, no mention of LKI and LKII projects. Contradicts similar articles/sections elsewhere. All that's wrong with Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.255.234.150 (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The section "Interwar period" contains many data and refs relared to Grosstraktor missing there. Also, please double-check whether Leichttraktor requires update with info from here (or vice versa). Staszek Lem (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The ((Merge)) template is inappropriate. Merging is blending two articles and having one left at end of it. This is about taking content from one and putting it in another. You can just copy the content from the one article to another and supply appropriate attribution for the edits. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for policy and process. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I want someone with expertise to do the merge, therefore I used the template. Now I found better ones: ((merge portions from)) ((merge portions to)).Staszek Lem (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Were they forced to use alcohol? I see nothing about this in the article. (PeacePeace (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC))Reply[reply]

I suggest that the WWI section be split off to a separate page in the same way that the WWII section is. Gusfriend (talk) 07:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]