GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tatenectes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 14:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I've added a few more links, thoughts? --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 17:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Looks good, how about cryptoclidid, belemnite, and Sundance Formation, and gastralium? FunkMonk (talk)
 Done --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 19:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not that I can think of. --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 17:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was thinking that it could go opposite to the cladogram. --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 17:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I guess it could be tried out now? There doesn't seem to have been issues raised at the paleoart review. FunkMonk (talk) 18:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Done --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 19:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nice, I think it would maybe be best to put it before the skeleton? Now it is a bit confusing that it is so far removed form the description section, coming after a photo of a different taxon. FunkMonk (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Done --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 20:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll look into this in a moment. --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 17:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Alright, I believe that they've been dealt with. That's a handy tool, by the way! --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 17:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Generally I just go with however the names are written in the publication of abbreviation for abbreviation. I'm not really sure how much consistency of abbreviation in citations matters, such variation is present in Puertasaurus, for example. I can change it if it's a problem, though. I did reformat the first name first reference, that citation template used the old "authors" parameter instead of "firstX" and "lastX", not to mention that "the" in the title was capitalized twice (this reference was present in the article before I started expanding it, which is why there was a difference in style). --Slate WeaselT - C - S⟩ 22:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, for GAN it isn't really important, but it is if you wish to take it to FAC at some point. But as far as I'm concerned, this can be promoted now. Next issue is where we put the peer review now that it's done... FunkMonk (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]