This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Theodore Roosevelt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Theodore Roosevelt is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Homeschooling, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HomeschoolingWikipedia:WikiProject HomeschoolingTemplate:WikiProject HomeschoolingHomeschooling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Robin Williams portrays Teddy Roosevelt in the Night at the Museum series of movies. (2006, 2009, 2014) 67.188.81.90 (talk) 03:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've added this to the article. Thank you! —Matthew - (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
THIS Info is a WONDERFUL Addition to the “In Popular Culture” section!!
I also think some “excitement” should be added to this entry — ie a bit of inspiration — (for anyone & everyone — especially Kids & Young Adults) — to become interested is seeing these 3 Historical & Magical Movies!
I’m not a great “Wordsmith” — but perhaps someone else will be inspired to assist in generating this interest by finding the “right words” to imaginatively illuminate:
Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt is beautifully portrayed and literally “Brought to Life” (by the legendary Robin Williams) in a Trilogy of truly Magical Movies:
2007 — Night at the Museum
2009 — Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
2015 — Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb
Mostly “historically accurate” — Teddy Roosevelt’s bravery & courage; his vivacious Vigor; as well as his soft yet strong Charm; and his somewhat simple yet brilliantly Wise Words & Excellent Advice are ALL illuminated in these 3 Films! Pulelehua11 (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
PS: tho I “get” that everything is wrote is not appropriate for Wikipedia— my hope is that a more talented writer than myself can & will “translate” what I wrote into the appropriate words to use! :) Pulelehua11 (talk) 22:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
At nearly 18k words of readable prose, this article is too long to read and navigate comfortably. See WP:TOOBIG. Detailed content should be condensed or moved to subarticles. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
While I partially agree that some of the sections here should be split off, I think it is important to note how such a complicated life, such of that as Roosevelt, needs a larger article to properly explain it. 2001:48F8:4028:1C23:E5B0:3E72:161C:35DC (talk) 04:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree--and when I was teaching I found that some students really enjoyed reading all the details about TR. Rjensen (talk) 00:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agree with with the IP editor, Pulelehua11 and Rjensen. While I don't object to trimming any excessively tangential prose and such, the contention that the article may be too difficult to navigate comfortably seems a little empty, as there is a Table of Contents. Besides, most readers only read the lede and one or a few sections of interest, and students and history buffs really interested in Roosevelt welcome extensive coverage.-- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In "Early Life and Family" section, 4th paragraph down, it says "Roosevelt began a heavy regime of exercise." I believe the word meant was "regimen." Perhaps some sentence rewording is in order. 142.190.79.202 (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed the typo, thanks for pointing that out. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I went through and counted up all the Harvard cite warnings and Harvard cite errors in this article... there are 63 Harvard cite warnings and 3 Harvard errors. If anyone around here wonders what I am referring to, I have "User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js" installed on my common.js page so I get to see ALLLLLL the Harvard cite problems in an article and man there are sure a lot fo them here. I am going to try to work my way through fixing everything, might take me a while. If anyone else wants to jump in and work on this together, feel free. Shearonink (talk) 04:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed the 3 Testi/Harv warning issues. Shearonink (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Gould/Four hats. One of the inline cites was to the whole book/had no page numbers. TG for Project MUSE. I don't know if any of the other errant Harvard cites are also missing page numbers...I sure hope not. If so, this will probably turn into a long-term project that is going to take Too Much Time. Yay. Shearonink (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Gould/2012. There are now 61 Harvard cite warnings... Shearonink (talk) 21:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Harbaugh/1963. Now only (!) 60... Shearonink (talk) 21:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks to Nikkimaria who fixed almost all of the remaining Harv cite issues. I've adjusted one more reference and the only two I see now remaining are 2 referencing puzzles, somewhat unique unto themselves = The Works and the Roosevelt Cyclopedia. Shearonink (talk) 05:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Both of these are cited inline in the text - there are actually quite a few books still cited inline in the text that could be moved, even though they don't cause visible errors. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The black-and-white one is artificially desaturated and also unrestored. It's misleading to present a sepia print as a black and white one. That no-one realised it was misleading because the person who uploaded it didn't say they made changes to it anywhere on the file description page is not a good reason to go back to it. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 14:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The black-and-white original is held by the LOC here. My understanding is that sepia toning is in fact an "artificial saturation" - but I don't think originality should be the defining factor here. The crop in the black and white image is better - the sepia one has too much empty space. Additionally, we should view it in the context of what other U.S. president articles feature. ITBF (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That is completely inaccurate. First of all, that's not the source of the image. That is a secondary image from "b&w film copy neg" E.g. a scan of a photograph of the photograph. It's under two megabytes in size. The Library of Congress rescanned it from the original, https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002718198/ - that is the actual colours of the photo. It's sepia. That's perfectly normal for prints; generally speaking, the only old photos that are natually fully black and white are scans directly from the original photographic glass plates.
Thirdly, the black and white is unrestored. There's numerous scratches and spots on the image. The lead image should direct people to the best possible image of the person, so that people seeking images for reuse find the best possible image. Most reusers are capable of desaturating an image themselves, if they must. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 17:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As I understand this, we're planning to replace the current lead image with File:Theodore Roosevelt by the Pach Bros.jpg? If so, yes, we absolutely should use that image. It has a higher quality, has been professionally restored, and will soon be a featured picture. Ed[talk][OMT] 18:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I believe it is ITBF who has been edit-warring, despite accusing Adam Cuerden. The version supported by Adam Cuerden is authentic and should be the lead image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I concur with ITBF. The infobox picture should provide a more centered view of subject and not be filled with empty space.Emiya1980 (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Emiya1980: Would a ((CSS image crop)) to similar dimensions be acceptable? It has the advantage of linking to the uncropped image, which has advantages for people wanting to reuse it (they can crop it to the size and dimensions they want, and have all the image to choose from to make their crop.) If you're not familiar, it's... slightly more complex to set up - I can do that - but offers more flexibility. And it presents the full-size version to MediaViewer, Google searches, and so on; again, probably better for image reusers. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 14:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
More or less the same as the current crop. It's a bit finicky to get an exact crop, but I can get one close easily. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 21:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Emiya1980: I've set up something that should be roughly as discussed, based on File:President Roosevelt - Pach Bros - black and white (cropped).jpg's crop.. If something's off about it, let me know. It is a little bigger, but I'm not sure that's the worst thing in a lead image. Arguably a better fit for the infobox. It can be shrunk, but it requires a surprising amount of math to do so, so I'd suggest bossing me around as I know how to do it. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 22:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As things currently stand, the image looks a bit too big for the infobox and there is still a substantial amount of unnecessary space at the top.
I just uploaded a cropped version of the Pach Bros. photograph. Would you be willing to consider this as an alternative?Emiya1980 (talk) 23:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There is as much space at the top as there is in the black and white - I had to add some as it kept being clearly less, and the size is shrinkable easy enough. I don't think a crop helps much, because it doesn't readily link the original image for reusers at the MediaViewer level. But I can tweak. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 01:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Try now. I've shrunk it a bit. Don't want to go TOO close to the top of his head, or it feels a little too... crowded, but I took another few pixels off. Just to be clear, File:President Roosevelt - Pach Bros - black and white (cropped).jpg is the old image, and it has a fair bit of headroom. If we're going for a more generous crop, I'd just go full, as there's not really that much empty space. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 01:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Had to fix the cHeight - it was creating blank space between image and caption (compare [1] with [2]) - but other than that minor fix, I'm fine with it.
You may allow your mind to wander at this point. It gets annoyingly mathematical from here
Long story short - and this is where CSS image crop gets annoying - if you want to include the bottom of the image, you have to calculate what the height of the image you're cropping from is, and then subtract from that whatever oTop is, because that's the amount you're cropping from the top, and that's the height of the crop you want. If you're cropping from the bottom, you can just trial by error cHeight until you've cropped out exactly what you want to crop from the bottom.
The calculation, by the way, using the parameters for CSS image crop, is: cHeight = (bWidth * (Original height) / (Original width)) - oTop. You can get the original height and original width from the file description page. In this case, the original image is 3,067 × 3,659 pixels. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 03:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There is a way to make this a little simpler, but I need to figure out if Lua allows you to get the original width and height of an image, or if I'd need to ask for them to be added.
Alternative image proposal
all this hustle because of 10% of empty space in a high quality historic photo? There is no need for crop or css, the photo is good as it is. Artem.G (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}