![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||
|
I don't agree that coach-style lines are universally more comfortable, and in any case that's unjustified and subjective, so I removed the modifier from the lead. Buses are just designed for their purpose, which has been well-defined for some time now--a coach0style bus would not be very comfortable carrying twice as many people as seats.65.117.234.99 (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Did You Know
....that a transit bus in the U.S. is usually operated by an urban-suburban bus line, a governmental public transit agency, or a contractor and is used on public transit routes? (suggested image:VOTC9218.jpg)
This article goes straight into discussing operation of transit buses in the United States.
Honestly, they exist elsewhere in the world (I think)... Also it doesn't actually state, in the lead section, what a transit bus is.
Also some references would be nice as to who decided that the bus described is known as a transit bus as opposed to some other term (commuter bus being an alternate name provided in the article).Garrie 11:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Daewoo City Bus.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Transit bus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
It is amazing this article was not deleted, free of references as it was, making it all original research. I added a few sources from the US for specifications. I hope others can add more inline references, now that there is a References section. - - Prairieplant (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)