This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains B‑class Mid‑importance Trains Portal Sel week 29, 2005 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Virginia B‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Appalachia B‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: West Virginia B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

	Virginian Railway is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 9, 2005 Featured article candidate Not promoted November 12, 2006 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Gerard: Thanks for adding the VGN herald.

Our VGN yahoo group is very active and if you do not already belong, you may wish to check us out at the link at bottom of Virginian Railway page.

Mark Fisher (vaoverland)Vaoverland 08:37, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

re: Virginian_Railway#A_partnership:_The_idea_man_from_Ansted_meets_a_millionaire This sentence: "He was also a very wealthy millionaire."... just struck me as funny. Was Huttleston Rogers a multimillionaire perhaps? I'd strike very wealthy but that's just me. Anyone know how much he was worth at various points? ++Lar: t/c 15:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have a point. I'll see about changing that wording to avoid the redundancy. Vaoverland

I'm delisting this as a good article because of POV issues (for instance "In a classic story of business intrigue" and "Fortunately, Henry Rogers recovered his health") and crufty information about mailing lists. --NE2 01:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:S VGN System Map Dec 1954 large.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have removed external links to discussion forums requiring registration, as they are a violation of WP:EL. -- HarveyHenkelmann (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I propose that the article Building the Virginian Railway be merged into Virginian Railway. I don't think the building article is significant enough (level similar to construction of the Transcontinental Railroad) to have its own article. Most other descriptions of railroads' constructions are in sections, not a different article. If the article gets to be merged, the history section of the VGN article mustn't be massive as well. TheGGoose (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The merged page idea makes sense but both articles have issues with lack of any substantive support for the statements they make concerning the origin of the Deepwater/Virginian Railway. Researchers are finding new source documents that, hopefully, will unravel the mysteries of the road. There has been a considerable amount of myth, speculation and gossip written about the origins. Much of it repeated as gospel truth. Until this research is finished and the results published, I would ask readers to consider with a bit of skepticism a lot of these "origin" statements. The truth will be more interesting than the myths. TWS 50.150.247.118 (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's a link to an article about the electrification of the Virginian. https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/33774/OS_ENG_v09_i02_011.pdf?sequence=4 173.216.206.160 (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]