Untitled[edit]

Why is it when a correction is made, someone with no knowledge undo's the correction? The intention of the FCC is to make channel sharing arrangements un-noticeable to casual viewers. That is why most likely the original WYCC channel number 20-1, will continue to be used. When WTTW buys the license of WYCC, the new owner gets a separate TV station with it's own call letters and channel number. WYCC's must carry rights and channel assignment on cable and satellite will also continue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


When WTTW purchases the license of WYCC in the near future, MHz WorldView will appear as Channel 20-1 under the WYCC call letters, although transmitting from WTTW's signal. MHz will not appear as Channel 11-5 as currently described on Wiki. Under channel sharing arrangements, which is this case here, both channels involved get to keep their original channel numbers and call letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk) 03:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Is this level of disambiguation necessary? -- Zoe

FWIW the programme the hacker interrupted was a broadcast of the 1977 Doctor Who story "The Horror of Fang Rock". Ironically enough when the normal signal was restored, it was at the part of the story where the Doctor finds the body of a victim electrocuted by the alien monster and his lines are "the shock must have killed him instantly"!

PMelvilleAustin 08:07 Mar 14, 2003 (UTC)

hijacking incident[edit]

It seems to me that the hijacking incident doesn't really belong in detail either here or under WGN but rather as a historical incident should have its own article and just be mentioned on these two sites. I'd love to know more about it (having witnessed it when I was living alone --- I thought he was saying something about watching me and such but then decided nobody could be and went to the kitchen until it got fixed.) but don't think it deserves more of the WTTW article's real estate. --Jaibe 19:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Separate Article for Soundstage[edit]

There should be a separate article for Soundstage, along with a list of performers who have appeared on the show. Mr. WTTW 01:21 Nov 23, 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:New d logo.jpg[edit]

Image:New d logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:New create.jpg[edit]

Image:New create.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wttw small.jpg[edit]

Image:Wttw small.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CRITICISMS[edit]

Local and national media watchdogs have found that WTTW has several key challenges.

Block quote <WTTW suffers from layoffs, an overpaid executive staff, embezzlement, and financial mismanagement. It appeals to for profit corporations for funds, staff, and board members. In fact, WTTW holds a place of infamy as being the only station fined by the FCC for excessive commercialism.>

This in turn effects the quality of programming. There are few progressive television programs like Bill Moyers Journal or Now. Also a lack of non-white racial representation on shows such as Chicago Tonight, which itself rarely covers local, national, or international news perferring to cover mostly sports and entertainment.[1] In general WTTW fails to

</regularly present perspectives by labor unions, the poor and working class, ethnic minorities or any of the demographics which comprise Chicago>

. [[2]] [3]<Chicago Media.org><Fairness and Accuracy in Journalism>

P3avery (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

References

  1. ^ <FAIR's newsmagazine Extra! 2004>
  2. ^ [Chicago Media.0rg
  3. ^ [Fairness and Accuracy in Journalism]

Museum?[edit]

Did WTTW, at one time, have a studio at the Museum of Science and Industry (in Chicago)? I have a long-ago youthful memory of such, from a Museum visit in perhaps 1963 or 1964. It may have been an exhibit, intended to illustrate how TV broadcasting is implemented. WHPratt (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WTTW. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1080i to 720p on 11.1 and 11.2[edit]

I remember in early 2020 these channels were both broadcasting in 1080i. I just checked and they are now both 720p, does anyone know why this happened? EDIT: It appears I was not the only one to notice this. Here is someone's tweet from November 5th 2020 https://twitter.com/scharlesb/status/1324441208630947842 73.110.210.136 (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.110.210.136 (talk) 01:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC) 73.110.210.136 (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mr Beast edit[edit]

Thanks for reverting the Mr. Beast edit to the WTTW page! 2601:246:C200:3990:7442:D8F7:4B18:F5F7 (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anyone know why the citation 8 on Max Headroom redirects to Google, or is it just my computer? 35.134.104.128 (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Anyone know why the citation 8 on Max Headroom redirects to Google, or is it just my computer? nevermind that previous message TCK2009 (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FNX on 11.6[edit]

There is no FNX on 11.6. I should know, I live in Chicagoland, with an antenna that has WTTW. I've never seen FNX on 11.6... only on channel 22 I think.

Louis Campfield (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories