Possible Clean Up Needed?[edit]

I am not sure. This page seems to be mostly long lists and little article detail. It certianly could use some improvment, should I tag a "Clean Up?" --ShortShadow 05:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say so. For such a long article, there is barely any real information.

Requested move[edit]

Wildfire already exists and is well-developed (by me, so I might be biased). However, according to naming conventions, "use the most easily recognized name." I'm not sure many people outside of the wildfire business would be able to identify the US term "Wildland fire." MrBell (talk) 20:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with move, and beyond just being a U.S. term, 'wildland fire' is a structural fire service term for brushfires. It wasn't used much in the forestry, and parks and land management, fields who did most of the major wildfire suppression, which historically is part of forestry and land management work and had little relationship at all to urban structural firefighting until recent years. The term is now common in the U.S., but only because interface zone fires have made interaction between the two more the norm. 96.239.151.131 (talk) 10:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Fire Use Article[edit]

This article needs a lot of work. I tried streamlining the history portion but with the amount of info about fire use, it might warrant a page of its own. I'll try finishing tweaking the article as I find the time. Beantwo (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More ideas for expansion[edit]

"San Diego has followed the national trend of cutting out local voices in favor of national syndicated programming to save money, but that raises serious questions about how quickly the public would be served during an emergency, such as a wildfire.

“The more disconnected ownership of media is to the community, the more disastrous the result,” Bartholomew said, adding that the quality of local news is declining with consolidation. He cited a now-infamous example. In North Dakota, a train wreck released poison gas. Clear Channel owned all six stations, which were broadcast out of state. Local and state emergency authorities tried to reach broadcasters to air warnings to the public, but were unable to contact them. “The result was one death and more than 1,000 injuries,” Bartholomew observed."[1]

Bushfire CRC: Assessing Aerial Suppression Drop Effectiveness MrBell (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still More[edit]

Overall a way better article with fire use/history moved. I might suggest bringing back at least part of the United States portion with the other two countries. Beantwo (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done just that, although I also renamed the branched off article to illustrate the fact that it solely describes wildfire suppression from a United States POV: history of wildfire suppression in the United States. Hope this helps, María (habla conmigo) 21:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A major element needs some sort of reference or link (updated)[edit]

About the following sentence:

Prevention of this situation is reinforced with two training protocols, Ten Standard Firefighting Orders and Eighteen Situations That Shout Watch Out, which warn firefighters of potentially dangerous situations, developed in the aftermath of the Mann Gulch fire.

I recently noticed that the article lacked any link or reference for these protocols. On sites like Wildfire Today, these protocols are sometimes referred to; they are called the "10 & 18" for short. Therefore, the existing situation was unsatisfactory. I tried adding a link to this external page which says what the "10 & 18" are, and a little about how they developed. My link was reverted by User:Zackmann08 who said, "external link doesn't go in article body". I'm not sure how to provide a link or reference, without having at least one other editor consider my attempt to be a violation of some Wikipedia policy or editorial standard. However, simply undoing my edit isn't sufficient. So we need to fix the article somehow. How? Oaklandguy (talk) 08:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I'm trying to provide same info, but as a footnote rather than an external link. Is this OK? Oaklandguy (talk) 04:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wildfire suppression. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wildfire suppression. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renewal of sources for this field.

Some of the citations do not work as readers do not have access to the scientific journals, like citation 23, while others do not exist at all, like citation 24, which cites page 144 of the book which does not exist at all, and citations 15 and 16, whose websites do not exist anymore. A lot of these information are dated, and go back to 2007-2008. In the decade that has passed, some of these fire fighting techniques and strategies might have evolved, and therefore renewal of this site should be looked into as the original authors have made a good job consolidating all the information, and anyone interested can help to update them. Quikshot (talk) 07:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Wildfire suppression. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CALIFORNIA DREAMING, THE GOLDEN STATE'S RHETORICAL APPEALS[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 October 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nicholas222222 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nicholas222222 (talk) 05:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories