This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windows 95 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Development of Windows 95 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 02 September 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Windows 95. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 24, 2004. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@Isi96:
I saw, as of now currently, the article is mainly about Win95 with mention of Win3/31/311 NT3/31/351/40...in MS official release context.
Except one, which is your edit, about unofficial release of dot NET for Win95.
There are many unofficial updates, mod, unofficially release such as unofficially OSR3, however...
...my take is, about unofficial updates/release, I would worried myself if I would to add this, will this would be removed for not WP:NOTABLE enough...
Just saying my observation. --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)