This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (December 2023)
The classification of this genus began in 1901 with Frederick Vincent Theobald.[1] Despite the passage of time, the taxonomy remains incompletely settled.[2][3][4] Classification into species is based on morphological characteristics - wing spots, head anatomy, larval and pupal anatomy, and chromosome structure, and more recently on DNA sequences.[5][6][7][8]
The genus Anopheles belongs to a subfamily Anophelinae with three genera: Anopheles Meigen (nearly worldwide distribution), Bironella Theobald (Australia only: 11 described species) and Chagasia Cruz (Neotropics: four described species). The genus Bironella has been divided into three subgenera: Bironella Theobald (two species), Brugella Edwards (three species) and Neobironella Tenorio (three species). Bironella appears to be the sister taxon to the Anopheles, with Chagasia forming the outgroup in this subfamily.
The genus has been subdivided into seven subgenera based primarily on the number and positions of specialized setae on the gonocoxites of the malegenitalia. The system of subgenera originated with the work of Christophers, who in 1915 described three subgenera: Anopheles (widely distributed), Myzomyia (later renamed Cellia) (Old World) and Nyssorhynchus (Neotropical). Nyssorhynchus was first described as Lavernia by Theobald. Frederick Wallace Edwards in 1932 added the subgenus Stethomyia (Neotropical distribution). Kerteszia was also described by Edwards in 1932, but then was recognised as a subgrouping of Nyssorhynchus. It was elevated to subgenus status by Komp in 1937; this subgenus is also found in the Neotropics. Two additional subgenera have since been recognised: Baimaia (Southeast Asia only) by Harbach et al. in 2005 and Lophopodomyia (Neotropical) by Antunes in 1937.
One species within each subgenus has been identified as the type species of that particular subgenus:
Within the genus Anopheles are two main groupings, one formed by the Cellia and Anopheles subgenera and a second by Kerteszia, Lophopodomyia, and Nyssorhynchus. Subgenus Stethomyia is an outlier with respect to these two taxa. Within the second group, Kerteszia and Nyssorhynchus appear to be sister taxa. Cellia appears to be more closely related to the Kerteszia-Lophopodomyia-Nyssorhynchus group than to Anopheles or Stethomyia, tentatively suggesting the following branching order: ( Stethomyia ( Anopheles ( Cellia ( Lophopodomyia ( Kerteszia, Nyssorhynchus))))).
The number of species currently recognised within the subgenera is given here in parentheses: Anopheles (206 species), Baimaia (one), Cellia (239), Kerteszia (12), Lophopodomyia (six), Nyssorhynchus (34) and Stethomyia (five).
The subgenus Baimaia may be elevated to genus level, as it appears to be a sister group to Bironella and all other Anopheles.[12]
Divisions below subgenus
Taxonomic units between subgenus and species are not currently recognised as official zoological names. In practice, a number of taxonomic levels have been introduced. The larger subgenera (Anopheles, Cellia, and Nyssorhynchus) have been subdivided into sections and series, which in turn have been divided into groups and subgroups. Below subgroup but above species level is the species complex. Taxonomic levels above species complex can be distinguished on morphological grounds. Species within a species complex are either morphologically identical or extremely similar and can only be reliably separated by microscopic examination of the chromosomes or DNA sequencing. The classification continues to be revised.
The first species complex was described in 1926 when the problem of nontransmission of malaria by Anopheles gambiae was solved by Falleroni, who recognised that An. gambiae was a complex of six species, of which only four could transmit malaria. This complex has subsequently been revised to a total of seven species of which five transmit malaria.
Subgenus Nyssorhynchus has been divided in three sections: Albimanus (19 species), Argyritarsis (11 species) and Myzorhynchella (four species). The Argyritarsis section has been subdivided into Albitarsis and Argyritarsis groups.
The Anopheles group was divided by Edwards into four series: Anopheles (worldwide), Myzorhynchus (Palearctic, Oriental, Australasian and Afrotropical), Cycloleppteron (Neotropical) and Lophoscelomyia (Oriental); and two groups, Arribalzagia (Neotropical) and Christya (Afrotropical). Reid and Knight (1961) modified this classification by subdividing the subgenus Anopheles into two sections, Angusticorn and Laticorn and six series. The division was based on the shape of their pupaltrumpets. The Laticorn section was created for those species with wide, funnel-shaped trumpets having the longest axis transverse to the stem, and the Angusticorn section for species with semitubular trumpets having the longest axis vertical more or less in line with the stem. The earlier Arribalzagia and Christya groups were considered to be series. The Angusticorn section includes members of the Anopheles, Cycloleppteron, and Lophoscelomyia series, and the Laticorn section includes the Arribalzagia (24 species), Christya, and Myzorhynchus series.
Cellia is the largest subgenus: all species within this subgenus are found in the Old World. It has been divided into six series - Cellia (eight species), Myzomyia (69 species), Neocellia (33 species), Neomyzomyia (99 species), Paramyzomyia (six species) and Pyretophorus (22 species). This classification was developed by Grjebine (in 1966), Reid (in 1968), and Gillies & de Meillon (also in 1968)[13] based on the work by Edwards in 1932. Series definition within this subgenus is based on the cibarial armature - a collection of specialized spicules borne ventrally at the posterior margin of the cibarium - which was first used as a taxonomic method by Christophers in 1933.
Kerteszia is a small subgenus found in South America whose larvae have specific ecological requirements; these can only develop within water that accumulates at the base of the follicular axis of the epiphyticBromeliaceae. Unlike the majority of mosquitoes, species in this subgenus are active during the day.
Within a number of species, separate subspecies have been identified. The diagnostic criteria and characteristic features of each subgenus are discussed on the own page.
Anopheles anthropophagus Xu and Feng is considered to be a junior synonym of Anopheles lesteri de Meillon 1931.
Anopheles bonneorum Fonseca & Ramos is considered to be a synonym of Anopheles costai.
Anopheles lewisi Ludlow 1920 is a synonym of Anopheles thomasi Shannon 1933.
Anopheles lineata Lutz is a synonym of Anopheles nimbus Theobald.
Anopheles mesopotamiae is considered to be a synonym of Anopheles hyrcanus.
Anopheles rossii Giles 1899 was originally described as Anopheles subpictus Grassi 1899.
Bironella derooki is a synonym of Anopheles soesiloi.
The following are currently regarded as nomina nuda:
Anopheles (Anopheles) solomonensis Cumpston 1924
Anopheles (Cellia) melanotarsis Woodhill & Lee
A subgroup of Anopheles gambiaesensu stricto has been reported and given the name Goundry. This subgroup has not yet been elevated to species status.[23]
References
^ abcdefghijklmTheobald, Frederick Vincent (1901). A Monograph of the Culicidae, or Mosquitoes. Vol. 1. London: British Museum (Natural History). ISBN978-1178519037.[page needed]
^Foley, Desmond H; Bryan, Joan H; Yeates, David; Saul, Allan (1998). "Evolution and Systematics of Anopheles:Insights from a Molecular Phylogeny of Australasian Mosquitoes". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 9 (2): 262–75. doi:10.1006/mpev.1997.0457. PMID9562985.
^Rattanarithikul, R; Harrison, B. A; Harbach, R. E; Panthusiri, P; Coleman, R. E; Panthusiri, P (2006). "Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand. IV. Anopheles". The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 37 (Suppl 2): 1–128. PMID17262930.
^Sedaghat, M. M; Harbach, R. E (2005). "An annotated checklist of the Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran". Journal of Vector Ecology. 30 (2): 272–6. PMID16599162.
^Walton, C; Somboon, P; o'Loughlin, S.M; Zhang, S; Harbach, R.E; Linton, Y.-M; Chen, B; Nolan, K; Duong, S; Fong, M.-Y; Vythilingum, I; Mohammed, Z.D; Trung, Ho Dinh; Butlin, R.K (2007). "Genetic diversity and molecular identification of mosquito species in the Anopheles maculatus group using the ITS2 region of rDNA". Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 7 (1): 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2006.05.001. PMID16782411.
^ abcMeigen, J.W. (1818). Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten [Systematic description of the known European two-winged insects] (in German). Aachen. OCLC13208765.[page needed]
^ abAbraham, O. K. (1947). "Anopheles kyondawensis n. sp. from Lower Burma". Medical Journal of Malaya. 1947 (1): 173–176.
^Harbach, Ralph E; Kitching, Ian J (2005). "Reconsideration of anopheline mosquito phylogeny (Diptera: Culicidae: Anophelinae) based on morphological data". Systematics and Biodiversity. 3 (4): 345–74. Bibcode:2005SyBio...3..345H. doi:10.1017/S147720000500174X. S2CID84208117.
^ abcdefghijGillies, M. T.; De Meillon, Botha (1968). The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian zoogeographical region) (2 ed.). Johannesburg: South African Institute for Medical Research. OCLC9614034.[page needed]
^Bonne-Wepster, J. (1951). "Anopheles venhuisi n. sp. [sic]". Documenta Neerlandica et Indonesica de Morbis Tropicis. 3: 24.
^Senevet, G.; Prunnelle, M. (1927). "Une nouvelle espèce d'anophèle en Algérie, Anopheles marteri n. sp" [A new species of anopheles in Algeria, Anopheles marteri n. sp]. Archives de l'Institut Pasteur d'Algérie (in French). 5 (4): 529–533.
^Spillings BL, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Chiphwanya J, Coetzee M, Hunt RH (2009) A new species concealed by Anopheles funestus Giles, a major malaria vector in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 81(3):510-5
^Nanda, Nutan; Singh, Om P; Dua, Virendra K; Pandey, Akhilesh C; Nagpal, Bhupender N; Adak, Tridibes; Dash, Aditya P; Subbarao, Sarala K (2013). "Population cytogenetic and molecular evidence for existence of a new species in Anopheles fluviatilis complex (Diptera: Culicidae)". Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 13: 218–23. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2012.09.018. PMID23146830.
^Coetzee, M.; Hunt, R. H.; Wilkerson, R.; Della Torre, A.; Coulibaly, M. B.; Besansky, N. J. (2013). "Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, new members of the Anopheles gambiae complex". Zootaxa. 3619 (3): 246–74. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3619.3.2. PMID26131476.
^Rona LD, Carvalho-Pinto CJ, Peixoto AA (2010) Molecular evidence for the occurrence of a new sibling species within the Anopheles (Kerteszia) cruzii complex in south-east Brazil. Malar J 26, 9(1):33
.png)
