Template is used to archive successful and unsuccessful DYK nominations when the discussion is closed.

Usage

[edit]

The template has three variable choices for closing a nomination (input under the "passed" variable). y or yes will result in the nomination being archived as promoted, n or no will result in the nomination being archived as not promoted, and w or withdrawn will result in the nomination being archived as not promoted due to the nominator withdrawing the nomination.


Successful nominations will be closed with syntax similar to ((subst:DYK top|passed=yes|monthyear=January 2013)) placed at the top of the nomination.

Which produces the following top archive statement and tag:

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy

[edit]

Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy

Created by Caponer (talk). Self nom at 17:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Great work on this one. Looks good! Patriarca12 (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Note: I've added a public domain image of Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy and "(pictured)" to the above approved hook. -- Caponer (talk) 01:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


With syntax similar to ((subst:DYK bottom|passed=yes)) placed at the bottom. If the nomination is unsuccessful, the top syntax will be similar to ((subst:DYK top|passed=no|monthyear=January 2013)) with ((subst:DYK bottom|passed=yes)) placed at the bottom.

It produces:

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of One Crazy Ride's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Length

One Crazy Ride

[edit]

Created/expanded by Bonkers The Clown (talk), Deepadeepa (talk). Nominated by Bonkers The Clown (talk) at 04:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Article currently at AFD and clearly has basic sourcing and content problems.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
  • AfD appears headed in the direction of "keep", and the article is being improved along the way; once the AfD closes one way or the other, it would be appropriate to re-review it to see if it then fulfills DYK requirements. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)