The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Created by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 00:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: This is a pretty lulzy article. I am a little concerned that, of five sources, one of them is a Wikipedia article -- it's clearly WP:ABOUTSELF, but I'm not sure what current consensus is about this specific sort of navel-gazing. I would appreciate if someone else could give some guidance here. jp×g 01:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
An exception is allowed when Wikipedia itself is being discussed in the article, which may cite an article, guideline, discussion, statistic, or other content from Wikipedia (or a sister project) to support a statement about Wikipedia.Does that answer your question? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Promoting the main hook to Prep 5. The consensus of the deletion discussion was to keep this article. There is no discussion on the talk page about any possible merge, so it meets the criteria to be featured on DYK. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)