The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Valereee (talk) 11:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Fischer quintuplets

Created by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC).

  • Bruxton I posted a QPQ above, but I linked it as QPQ 1 of 2 since it was a double nomination that I reviewed. I didn't know that 1963 was a public domain year. The magazine I checked out from the library has full color spreads of them from 1965. Could that work? SL93 (talk) 02:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Before 64 images had to be copyrighted and renewed, 64 and after the term is 75 years. Maybe worth a try. Works published before 1964 in the US are all in the public domain, excepting only those for which a renewal was registered with the US Copyright Office.[1][2] Relatively few works from this era have had their copyrights renewed. A US Copyright Office study in 1961 found that fewer than 15% of registered copyrights had been renewed. Bruxton (talk) 03:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)