This template is used when an article has too much or indiscriminately-listed gaming trivia, and should be cleaned up according to the Wikipedia trivia guidelines and/or Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Video games.
Tracking categories[edit]
See also[edit]
Other plot- and fiction-related templates
|
|
|
Other trivia-related templates
|
- General trivia
((Trivia)) – Suggests relocation of the relevant details in a trivia section, to another section (or article).((Trivia section)) – Same as above, but goes at the top of the trivia section, rather than the top of the article.- Relevance and importance
((Off topic)) – For a section that has wandered from the topic of the article((Content)) – For an article or section containing information whose relevance is disputed.((Importance section)) – For a section with information that is simply off-topic for the article, and needs removal or relocation to another article.((Importance inline)) – For a particular item that is off-topic needs removal or relocation to another article.((Self-sourcing examples)) – For an article or section with poorly cited examples.((Better source example)) – For a particular instance of a poorly cited example.((Relevance inline)) – For a particular item that doesn't seem to belong in the context at all.((Non sequitur)) – For a namedropping of someone or something the relevance of which may not be clear to the reader.- Excessive detail
((Overly detailed)) – For excessive focus on minute details not of interest to our general readership.((Summarize section)) – For sections that are too detailed and need to be summarized.((Example farm)) – For excessive use of examples.((Too many see alsos)) – For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose.- Topical trivia
((In popular culture)) – For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.((Fiction trivia)) (or ((In-universe))) – For too many trivial fictional references (or too much "in-universe" detail).((Long plot)), ((All plot)) – For excessively detailed plot summaries.((Cleanup book)), ((Cleanup film)) – For excessive detail about particular types of works (other than plot and fictional or in-universe issues).((Game trivia)) – For too much gaming-related trivia.((MOSLOW)) – For list that does not follow the Manual of Style for lists of works, e.g. not in chronological order((Cleanup university)), ((Cleanup school)) – For excessive detail about an educational institution.((Famous)) – For an indiscriminate list of "famous" people associated in some way with a topic.((Localist)) – For local-interest trivia that is unverifiable or otherwise unencyclopedic.- List cleanup
((Prose)) – Suggests converting into prose a section that consists of a list.((Cleanup list)) – For indiscriminate lists that need reduction.((List to table)) – For use where a table would be better than a list.
|
