Please contribute to other comparison tables[edit]

See

I'm assuming the r^out and r^in are radii of transmission in and out? Hence, transmitting out is harder since clients have less powerful trnasmitters than base stations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.155.105 (talk) 04:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Citations needed[edit]

Link layer throughput and range distances are highly dependent on location, interference, and application. Without reference to the testing conditions these numbers are meaningless, and just serve to spread misinformation to those assuming that Wikipedia is (always) a reliable source. Jpgs (talk) 00:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

in my opinion the ranges should be specified as theoretical and not approximate in a sense of what Jpgs is speaking of 66.189.173.57 (talk) 07:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Indeed it would be nice if all the listed ranges were coming from a normalized measurement, hopefully from a single source. The highly excessive range noted for 802.11n when compared to 802.11g is allowed by STBC, LDPC, MCS 32 and up to 4x4 MIMO (Allow for 2x MRC reception and an optional 2x non-standard beamforming and/or antenna selection advantage). -bkil (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Release dates[edit]

I updated "Release date" column for 802.11ax/ay/ba/bb.

Those are based on the column "RevCom & Standards Board Final or Continuous Process Approval" found on OFFICIAL IEEE 802.11 WORKING GROUP PROJECT TIMELINES - 2020-11-30

Feelthhis (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories