Template:Afd top is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use ((edit template-protected)) to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Ed, re [1], why would "expensive" parser functions even matter in archives which pull so few views? Selery (talk) 22:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
@Oleg Alexandrov:, @The wub:, and anybody else: Would it be okay to remove the italics to the bolded, red, italicized text "Please do not modify it."? Generally, it is bad style to both bold and italicize something, and the red makes it even worse/more unnecessary. This can be accomplished by putting two extra ' on both sides of the text for the top and bottom templates. While we're at it, color could be changed to #C00 as well. See the example and the original below it:
Mnnlaxer (talk) 20:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
As per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 February 15, amplification of this template is suggested.
Was:
appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).
New:
appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page, the closing administrator's talk page, the AfD talk page, or in a deletion review).
I propose that the template be updated so that when the result is "delete", instead of "such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review", the template should produce "such as in a deletion review", as there should be no talk page from that point on. Largoplazo (talk) 00:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the "archived" class so tools can recognize discussions as having been archived. At least Bawl, Convenient Discussions and Reply-link recognize this, possibly others that I'm unaware of.
− | class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" | + | class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" |
— Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)