Computing: Networking Template‑class Mid‑importance

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This template is supported by Networking task force (assessed as High-importance).

Telecommunications Template‑class Mid‑importance

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This template has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I wanted to bring up an edit which included the following Wanted pages:

• Building area network (earlier I turned this into a redirect)
• Neighborhood area network
• Industrial area network (currently linked from Internet area network as a disambiguation) - some potential sources: [1], [2]
• Field area network
• Local metrological network [de] - this one's an earlier item that was commented out.

As a result of subsequent edits I went ahead and commented out all remaining red links from the template for aesthetic reasons. I'm bringing this topic into the talk page for more practical reasons: Do these topics have sufficient supporting reference materials to make proper articles? Or would it be better to simply remove all the unused entries? A quick search revealed some potential articles for one topic (listed above) but I don't generally start new articles on Wikipedia, so I'm bringing the topic out to the general community. --Stux (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]