This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Accidents This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This template is supported by the Aviation accident project. Disaster management This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Years This template is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles

I just noticed the entry for the 2022 Dallas airshow mid-air collision includes "loss of Texas Raiders". To my knowledge, this is the only instance of an aircraft with its own article being directly linked in an aviation accidents and incidents navbox. Personally, I don't see the benefits to cluttering the navbox with links which can be found within the accident article. - ZLEA _T\^C 03:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree with you. Nine-O-Nine for example is not linked next to the corresponding crash in Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2019. It seems like unnecessary clutter. – Recoil (talk) 09:32, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]