Companies Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the ((portal|Companies)) template Tag company talk pages with the ((WikiProject Companies)) project banner Answer requests for comments

This template was nominated for deletion on December 13, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

I've only included subsidiaries / majority-owned companies, not companies where Berkshire Hathaway has a minority stake, like Coca-Cola and PetroChina. --Crocodile Punter 11:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

right only wholy owned subsidiaries, I changed Chase to Decker (sorry to see him go) Pohick2 (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

by adding all the newspapers (former Media General papers from here [1]). I know, the infobox is much less pretty (useful?) now.

Should the World-Herald Co. and Media World have their own articles? They are "sister companies" under BH Media Group; the W-H Co. subsidiary Midlands Newspapers owns most of the properties on its branch. Maybe only "major" newspapers should be listed.

Buffalo and Business Wire are separate, AFAIK. Woodshed (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]