 | This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles | | | Template | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. | | | Food and Drink task list: |
|---|
- To edit this page, select here
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
- Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
- Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
- Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
- Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
- Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
- Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
- Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
- Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
|
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
|
|
|
Is there a reason why external links are placed directly in the template? I'm not going to jump the gun and just remove them, but I'm not sure they should be there. Protonk (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
User:Spshu recently made several changes to this template that I disagreed with. I reverted them with a rather poor explanation of simply "RV - Undo". Spshu undid my changes and reverted them a gain with a more descriptive reason for my revert, and was reverted again. I am asking that he revert his changes and discuss this here. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 01:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- As pointed out on my talk page regarding the intergration of the above group item with the section/group headers: They are duplicate of the group titles. If some one can not understand as the section titles then they will not understand them in the "above" section. So, some how they are no longer about Burger King or McDonald. Basic common sense and is routinely used when possible on all navboxes. This keeps them more compact, makes the section headers more useful and keeps related links together. Spshu (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- yes, the current version is much better and more compact. also, can we remove the excessive styling and use the defaults? this would better match the format used by other navboxes, like Template:McDonald's. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
