This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Communism template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

Socialism Template‑class Top‑importance

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Top This template has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

I have removed the custom colors from this template, as they serve no encyclopedic purpose. See also ((Nazism)) and ((Neo-Nazism)), where similar color schemes have been removed. -- The Anome (talk) 10:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add an image of the hammer and sickle 151.188.25.146 (talk) 14:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the ((edit semi-protected)) template. I don't see a need for a single symbol of communism to be included. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I removed some of the related topic links, merely by investigating whether the template appears as a sidebar or at the footer section of the article. As a disclaimer, I regard templates transcluding links as nearly always OR, often misleading, pedagogical, or distracting, proposing a "series" of articles by this template's content deepens the potential to veer from NPOV. The exceptional example is a taxobox, which is not an arrangement contrived here but a verifiable representation of sourced content. ~ cygnis insignis 07:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

firstly, there needs to be some form of logo, secondly, the topics need redoing. the division between ideas and aspects seems arbitrary, and the organisation tab is largely redundant. we also need an economics section. Thatjakelad (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There doesn't need to be a 'logo' (symbols, actually) in navboxes, in fact, they are very discouraged (see WP:NAVIMAGES). These take away attention from the actual contents of the navbox. And we're dealing with a broad and serious topic here; unnecessary decoration looks unprofessional. –Vipz (talk) 22:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Request to add Communist propaganda under related topics. 223.25.74.34 (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done, but in a new section called "Criticism" alongside Anti-communism, Criticism of communist party rule, and Criticism of Marxism. –Vipz (talk) 19:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]