Mathematics Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This template was considered for deletion on 28 April 2010. The result of the discussion was "keep for now".

This template was considered for deletion on 13 June 2010. The result of the discussion was "keep for now".

“Divisor class” has 61000 Google hits which look mostly unrelated. Divisor class and Divisor class group redirect to articles on specific topics. I think “Divisor classes” is an unfortunate heading for the box made by this template. I'm not sure what it should be called though. Maybe “Divisor properties”, “Divisor-related properties”, or “Divisor-related sets”? Something like “Numbers with special divisor properties“ may be too long. PrimeHunter 13:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree. I came across the need to consolidate some see also lists, and I clearly had enough of them to make a box. I was lost for what to name the list I came up with. If some mathematician comes up with a better name I will be happy to make the changes. — Randall Bart 16:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm probably going to show my ignorance of number systems here, but would rational numbers be an appropriate addition to the template list? — Lee Carré 08:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No. These are all articles about number theory; specifically about factorization of integers. — Randall Bart ^(talk) 12:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This infobox has been retired and replaced in all relevant articles with the equivalent navbox-style Template:Divisor classes navbox. Please use the navbox-style template in any new articles. Gandalf61 (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]