Television: Stations Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by the Television stations task force.

Ok, why merge the Fargo and Grand Forks templates? Also, why make this the real template and the Grand Forks template just a redirect to this one? I think that at the very least this template should be reamed so it doesn't put such an emphasis on Fargo. --MatthewUND^(talk) 02:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I still don't like the idea of Fargo and Grand Forks having just one template called "Fargo TV". The two cities have their own lineup of channels. I would like to go back to having a template for both markets. --MatthewUND^(talk) 09:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm assuming they merged (redirected) the GF template to the Fargo template because the Grand Forks is a part of the Fargo market, though they do have different stations.--grejlen - talk 02:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That was a good idea of splitting up the template into which the area the station(s) target, Raccoon Fox. I'm doing that in the Western ND market since they have a mult-city structure also.--grejlen - talk 21:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I disagree. Merging was a bad idea, the Grand Forks template should be restored - there are some commonalites between Fargo and Grand Forks but not enough to merit this mess. --AlexWCovington (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]