|WikiProject Feminism||(Rated Template-class)|
I find the dark blue of the link color quite difficult to read on the dark purple background. I notice that the [hide] link is white -- does anyone have objections to the header and footer being put in white also? How does one do that anyway? See a contrast readability checker, which the current color combo failed, both unvisited and visited links (blue and purple).
This is also a problem on ((Feminism sidebar)), with both the show/hide options and the link to Women's suffrage.
The ideal color combination for accessibility is dark text on light background rather than light on dark, iirc, but I dunno. If others find it pressing, maybe we could think about that too. —Switchercat talkcont 01:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't quite see how a specific political phrase in the U.S. with over-arching breadth to mean whatever the particular topic of the day is amounts to a concept. It's very geographically specific to the U.S. and charged rhetoric, not a defining concept of an ideology. Every criticism that is described as "War on Women" is really covered in other places such as abortion rights, equal pay, etc. Really, it's a political slogan for "Anti-feminism" but in the U.S. "anti-feminist" is not as negative an identity so a more virulent expression was created to replace it in the U.S. It should be removed as it's not a particular concept of feminism. Comment? --DHeyward (talk) 19:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)