This template is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Currently, the template links to European Union arms embargo on the People's Republic of China for relations between the PR China and the EU. Even in the absence of a full article on the subject, I don't think that linking to a page about an arms embargo conveys a full picture of Euro-Chinese relations, and even portrays them as centred around trade sanctions. Until a full article is written, would it be better to remove the link altogether, or to link to this , which is at least a short summary?
it is just a link to the only thing we have on the subject. It is hardly misleading as the article has its own title. Better to provide something than nothing. But please do start a full article.- J.Logan`t: 18:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
