This template is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Engineering Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering Template:WikiProject Engineering Engineering articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
The template was grouped by
but I changed it to say
1 to 9999
10000 to 19999
20000+ It looks a little uglier but it is more correct. Jason Quinn (talk ) 20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in the List of International Organization for Standardization standards article, for the sake of consistency, ie:1-999
1000-9999
10000-19999
20000-29999
30000-39999
40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000) Mitch Ames (talk ) 04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply [ reply ] I am writing several articles on project management as part of the ASCE Body of Knowledge project ( or ASCE BoK) as well as the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge project ( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials....
Thanks ...
Risk Engineer (talk ) 17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=
or |ans=
parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262 ) Cynosure1 (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
Done – Jonesey95 (talk ) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply [ reply ] This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=
or |ans=
parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Can we get 14496-10 updated for WP:BRINT ? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly to Advanced Video Coding (avoiding the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC redirect). Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk ) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
@1234qwer1234qwer4 : Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk ) 23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ] This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=
or |ans=
parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link to Versatile Video Coding . This can be seen at MPEG-I — MPEG . Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk ) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
@1234qwer1234qwer4 : Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20): https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html 50.53.23.14 (talk ) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]
Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 ) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply [ reply ]