Film: American Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Is it really wise for this template to include films where Whedon only acted as a script doctor? The Writers Guild of America has decided that Whedon's contributions were insufficient for him to receive credit for Speed, Waterworld, Twister, etc – if we don't respect this, where do we draw the line? I think the current inclusion of uncredited minor revisions takes away from the focus of the navbox – Whedon's creative output. —Flax5 23:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]