Lists Template‑class
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Template This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Writing systems Template‑class

This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I am sorry for my revert, but the recent expansion adds extreme clutter. This template is transcluded from a large number of pages. If you want to create a giant "list of scripts" template, please do it under an alternative title (and select a limited number of articles where transclusion may be appropriate). dab (𒁳) 14:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I've tried to solve this by separating the full clutter to ((List of writing systems)) and keeping a sleek version at ((Writing systems)). Wikipedia needs a constant effort at countering the natural tendency towards excessive template clutter. dab (𒁳) 15:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the Klingon alphabets under Alphabets - Linear. Thank you. 1.127.108.26 (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:15, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please have these neologisms removed from the template? Wikipedia is the only website that uses these terms, they are NOT listed in ANY dictionary. Clearly some editor has devised these words and decided to impose their neologism upon everyone else. It's utterly ludicrous for Wikipedia to use a neologism that no user can possibly find the meaning for. 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove "somacheirograms" and replace it with "others" or "sign languages". "somacheirographic" and "somacheirogram" aren't real words and they are not listed in ANY dictionary. It is absolutely ludicrous for Wikipedia to use neologisms, especially neologisms with no actual dictionary definition. How is a user supposed to understand what is being said when a hitherto unused and unheard-of word is used, especially when a far less ambiguous term could be used like "sign languages'. 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1.157.95.133 (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change Coorgi–Cox_alphabet from the Alphabets section to the Abugidas section, as it is not an alphabet despite the name. 2405:6581:A9A0:2E00:A1EC:DEA2:DDEE:107 (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2405:6581:A9A0:2E00:A1EC:DEA2:DDEE:107: It is an alphabet, which I corrected in the article. --Glennznl (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely not a comprehensive list of what writing systems are currently used. It seems strange to single these ones out, and also has political undertones. I think it might be better to not have a section like this.--Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 23:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Sunuwar alphabet added to alphabets Aonadh nan Gaidheal (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]