This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NAHL
The Southern Minnesota Express will be leaving Minnesota Limasbravo (talk) 14:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Amateur/High-School
I added the MSHSL and Shattuck St. Mary's to the list. Wondering where the Minnesota Thoroghbreds should be added. They're high-school age (19 and under), but they're hockey only. I added them to the hockey teams listing for now. Limasbravo (talk) 14:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'd say remove them. While Shattuck may have a formidable program, you have to draw the line somewhere. ccwaters (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Shouldn't the MSHSL be listed at the very least? MSHSL events, especially the end of year state tournaments are much more attended and known than the junior teams are. Is only teams college age or older? If so, then the template should be reworded and the NAHL teams should be removed as well. Limasbravo (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Major Junior (QMJHL, OHL, WHL) and Div I NCAA, seem to be the threshold. So NAHL should go too. ccwaters (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So, what does "Major Junior" mean? As far as I know, the OHL, QMJHL, and WHL are all Canadian-based leagues, with the USHL and NAHL being the United States' primary Junior "A" league So, the USHL and/or NAHL should be included, but nothing below that. Tom Danson (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think a link should be provided to the MSHSL as a parent organization. Also, any thoughts on historical/defunct teams? I think a section for historical teams would be a nice addition. matt91486 (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
