Carnivorous plants: Plants Template‑class

Nepenthes is within the scope of WikiProject Carnivorous plants, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to carnivorous plants. For more information, visit the project page.Carnivorous plantsWikipedia:WikiProject Carnivorous plantsTemplate:WikiProject Carnivorous plantscarnivorous plant articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by WikiProject Plants.

This otherwise nice template does not scale well. I tried it with opera and firefox, and with both the font breaks out of the right border when the page is zoomed in. I changed the absolute 600px width to 40 em, this solves the problem for my browsers. Don't know about MS exploiter, though. --Sarefo 04:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hm, very strange. although the template scaled nicely when trying it out in a sandbox, it was flowing over in its 'natural habitat' (Nepenthes pages). I enlarged the width to 48em, but have no idea what causes this double behavior. --Sarefo 05:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've just reverted the insertion of large number of the html <br /> into this template. A list is not a piece of prose broken up by line breaks as anyone using a screen reader will tell you. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility #Lists clearly states "Do not separate list items with line breaks (<br />). Use one of the following methods ... Unbulleted lists ... Horizontal lists" --RexxS (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, and there is also the issue of wp:deviations in the MOS which says to eschew all that raw html in favour of normal wiki-syntax. Anything with center and font tags is ripe for refactoring, anyway. I took things further, too; and the other way, too, by adding style=width:auto; which restores the width-per-content look that the prior implementation had. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

looks good. the massive div/br version had text overflowing outside of the box on my browser. this version looks good. Frietjes (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Much better, but we still have what is logically a single list broken up into multiple lists, solely for the purpose of creating arbitrary columns for visual presentation. Can we not avoid this? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]