This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Can someone edit this state template, so that it matches the templates for the other 49 states? Namely: the other state templates have the senators and representatives numbered, in numerical order, from #1 to (whatever). For some reason, this is the only state template that does not contain the numbering. I'd fix it, but I don't know how to do so. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here's my guess at why this is the case: You'll notice that the representatives do in fact have numbers for their districts; they are listed after the name, by county. That is, in fact, how the districts are identified in New Hampshire (and in Vermont). Putting a number before the name would not reflect the actual number of the district. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ken Gallager: Thanks. But, I am not referring to the number of the district. I am simply referring to the number of representatives. In this case, the list would go from #1 to #400. That is simply a "count" of the representatives. That number (the count) has nothing to do with the representative's district. For example, see the template for the state of Maine, located here:
. That is an example of what I am referring to. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - that answers my concerns. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I am beginning to wonder if the preceding number (before the politician's name) is simply an ordinal "count" ... or if it represents a district number. In some states, the two numbers would coincide; in some states, not. Does anyone know for sure? Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
