This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This template was considered for deletion on 30 August 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".
Tasc, I have restored the prior hierarchical arrangement which shows the soverign member states in a larger font in the first line and, in a smaller font size below them, the associate insular members that have home rule and separate associate memberships in the Council. Do not change format without providing a reasonable justification on this talk page. Thanks you for your enrhusiasm. //Big Adamsky • BA's talk page 16:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i didn't change font size or anything. I've only moved associate members title in line with the states name. I don't see any reasons for having such huge template for only 8 links. --tasc 17:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please do not keep changing font size or moving sub-captions. What you can do to help is to perhaps decrease the width of the box to make it more compact. //Big Adamsky • BA's talk page 17:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
why not? this template is bigger than any other. Just have a look at denmark for example. It's just ridiculous how the bottom of the article looks like. --tasc 17:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ridiculous or not, that's your personal preference. My reasoning is that it is helpful to distinguish visually (i.e. with reduced font size) between soveregin member states and associate members. //Big Adamsky • BA's talk page 17:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is different! 100 vs 90%. What was before just impossible to read! And there is subtitle associate member. What else is needed? --tasc 17:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's better now with the width reduced. But the caption is slightly offset towards the left, because of the flag. If you can fix this, that would be an improvement, too. Thanks. //Big Adamsky • BA's talk page 17:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I can, but i will not. You're seem advanced enough user to figure out how to change such simplest thing. bye. --tasc 17:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, nobody can force you to help out or contribute, Tasc. Thanks for that help you did provide by adjusting the width, that was a positive contribution. Goodbye for now. //Big Adamsky • BA's talk page 17:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I didn't mean only for now. :\ --tasc 17:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
