United States: North Dakota Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by WikiProject North Dakota.

I've reverted the changes to the North Dakota template to bring it back in line with other state templates. I see that the New York template is similar to the new ND template, but the Kansas and California ones are still very much like the old one.

I think the new template was also too harsh on the size of North Dakota cities; nobody in North Dakota considers Fargo the only major city. I've put up an alternate version for discussion --Alexwcovington (talk) 15:27, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This alternate template looks much better than this current version. I feel it should replace this current version (but the name would have to be changed to Template:North Dakota). //MrD9 05:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks!—Webdinger ^{BLAH | SZ} 22:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems a little pathetic to refer to Beulah, Hazen, Rugby, and even Grafton as "large cities." I propose that we limit the cities in this section to just those of over 5,000 people. --MatthewUND^(talk) 06:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]