Novels Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

	Oz NA‑class (inactive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OzWikipedia:WikiProject OzTemplate:WikiProject OzOz articles NA This article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Children's literature Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Tasks you can do: edit history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add ((Portal|Children's literature)) to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with ((WikiProject Children's literature)) Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article edit

Wicked and its sequels, all non-canonical are less releavent to this template than the original Oz books. I propose that they either be deleted or the original Oz books listed. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nevertheless, the "canon" of Oz has always been a rather loose concept. I propose that Gregory Maguire be included in the list of authors. 68.148.173.40 (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You'd never know it looking at the template. Evidently the parodies make fun of the movies.Varlaam (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, you would if you actually looked at it.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bugger off, and put the bloody books in the template.

And mind your manners. Varlaam (talk) 06:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Apparently, the sarcasm got away from some here. It currently looks like baums books are properly represented.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which film is this? is it the adaption slated for 2012, mentioned at Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz#Future adaptations?[1] or something else? It should not be in the template unless we know which film its referring to and whether its assured to qualify for an article. the film we already mention that i have guessed it is doesnt seem to be notable enough to be in the template (though i could be wrong, as any baum fan worth their salt should be salivating over accurately portrayed characters and a script based strictly on the book).If its this film [2], its not notable yet.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DoctorHver, what did "reimaged" mean? – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was supposed too mean Reimagining i.e those films that don't fit in with the oz cannon one way or another. DoctorHver (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shouldn't Yankee and Enchanted Island be grouped with Thompson's other books? Goustien (talk) 03:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]