Mammals Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Primates Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Nice box! :) - UtherSRG (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i just saw the carnivora template and it was much more detailed. it includes the specific and gereric names too. the primates template needs to catch up. maybe ill sign in and do it im just as lazy as yall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.40.6.221 (talk) 22:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It might be neat to expand the box like ((Carnivora)), but primate taxonomy changes frequently, so it would be a lot of work to maintain. Anyone else watching this template agree that we should expand? – VisionHolder « talk » 08:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no inherent reason to have navigation templates at the species or family level. However, I'd prefer to have individual navboxes at somewhat manageable size, and a single navbox for the entire primate order doesn't seem manageable to me. Ucucha (talk) 23:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]