This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment This environment-related template is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Health and fitness This template is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles Medicine This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Sanitation This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by MiszaBot I.

I am thinking that a link should be added to the article behavior change (public health). Do you agree? EvM-Susana (talk) 08:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

have added it now, as there were no objections. EvM-Susana (talk) 21:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done most of the maintenance job

• ICON
• Below bar
• Top bar
• list check

should only come back here once half years for quick scan.(if encounter any question leave in my talk page) --Composcompos12 (talk) 05:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An IP user posted at Wikipedia:Help desk#Help with Template:Public health objecting to this edit and this edit by Bazj, having already reverted the changes. I have repeated most of the removals. This template is already very large, perhaps too large to be useful as a navbox. What should and should not belong here? Does anyone care to comment? DES ^(talk) 17:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DESiegel, Given the fact that the reversion reinstates Composcompos12's edits, the complaint at Wikipedia:Help desk#Help with Template:Public health shares Composcompos12's poor English ([1][2]), shares a focus of interest with Composcompos12, and the IP geolocates to Taiwan, Composcompos12's location, it seems fairly obvious that the IP is Composcompos12. Quack! I think however it's just another piece of incompetence^(*) rather than sockpuppetry.

As for the template, even stripping the template back to a version predating Composcompos12's contributions would leave it full of bloat. Including a chunk on statistics is as irrelevant as including a section on pen-manufacturing because folks working in PH write stuff down.

I'll post a request for help at WT:MED. Bazj (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bazj as per WP:LOGOUT "There is no policy against editing while logged out." and doing so is not sock puppetry, unless the editor attempted to deceive others into thinking that multiple different editors were making the edits. So it doesn't really matter if the IP is in fact Composcompos12 or if they merely agree. I agree that the current template is over-large, and should be cut down. DES ^(talk) 20:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DESiegel, Logged out user reverting to reinstate edits of logged in user would constitute puppetry as it creates the impression that two editors favour that version rather than just one. 1st & 5th example at WP:ILLEGIT. Bazj (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I also wonder if this template has become too big and complex but I am not so sure what the guidelines would say and perhaps public health is a large and complex topic? Nevertheless we shouldn't go into too much detail on sub-topics of public health, I guess. - What are the other areas where improvements are needed for this template? What are your suggestions? Perhaps User:Doc_James has an opinion?EvMsmile (talk) 03:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure. Do not tend to work on these myself. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1. add above list
2. arrange the certification system
3. fix the below bar

that pretty much everything,couldn't see this temple need anymore extended ,I guess I should focus on other temple ,farewell

by phoenix --61.62.95.113 (talk) 06:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In addition to Good agricultural practice and Good manufacturing practice, Good laboratory practice and Good clinical practice, generally cumulatively referred as GxP, should also be included. Pietro (talk) 10:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe we should add a whole new sub-category here about professions/occupations of those working in public health? EMsmile (talk) 15:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]