Film: American Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Is it worth adding the section for films he's presented? -- Harish - 14:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the fact that he has disowned his involvement with what became Natural Born Killers, I took it off his "Written" list. - Michael

I've reverted this, as he is still credited for it and the fact that he disowned it is irrelevant. I also fixed your formating error :) Misterkillboy (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I, for one, am against adding the years of CSI to this template. It seems to me that in that way the template insinuates that QT has been working on CSI all those years. --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 14:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Crave Danger should stay but it makes no sense to have CSI there. --Harthacnut (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems obvious to me. No years for CSI. He did one 2-part episode.--Mike Selinker (talk) 02:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think Crimson Tide should be added to the 'Written' section. Tarantino did an uncredited rewrite of the screenplay. If that's not enough, then the film should at least be listed in the miscellaneous 'Other work' section. Flax5 (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]