Redirect Template‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I am neutral as to the template's use of the unprintworthy category, but I want to make sure I understand the rationale. Is it mainly:

1. Filenames are not generally notable independently from their associated software
2. Most filenames are alphabetically close to their corresponding software, such that beginning to type the filename into the search box would show the software as a result (does WINWORD.EXE count as an exception?)

Or both, or neither? If neither, should we provide a |printworthy parameter to override the categorization (cf. corresponding feature of r from song)? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To editor SoledadKabocha: Sorry for the very late response – this was one of the few rcats not on my watchlist. Both of your reasons work for me, and I'm not sure if the exception you noted is the exception, the rule or that there is an approximately equal mixture of filenames that are different and those that are similar search terms. In any case, I would have to agree with the one(s) who thought filenames to be unprintworthy redirects. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 04:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]