England Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Trains: in UK Template‑class

Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

R-B-S in the commuter line section?

It is part of the WCML so should be mainline surely?

Worley-d 00:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree so change it. Simply south 00:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've added the original operating name of this railway to the disused section - the old Midland Railway route from Wolverhampton to Walsall via Wednesfield as confusingly it was known when open as the Walsall - Wolverhampton Line. Unfortunately it's a different animal to the current line of that name, so it doesn't match all the other lines in name. Hope that's OK with everyone! Fingerpuppet 17:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editors may be interested in the debate currently ongoing at Template talk:Railway lines in South-East England over the layout, classification and geographical scope of these templates. Pickle 16:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

test (minus cats) Pickle 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

old version (mius cats) Pickle 17:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks good to me. My only concern about v-d-e is that it contravenes Wikipedia:Avoid self-references, but the practice is wide-spread so I don't think it should be a problem. – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good point, I'm not sure if there is a way around it, or whether it falls within the exceptions at Wikipedia:Avoid self-references or if its a good case for WP:IAR. I like v-d-e, as you can get at them to edit them and you can "hide" it if you don't want it in the way. Pickle 19:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see the previous template had an "edit" facility anyway, so you haven't made it worse. Incidentally, I prefer it centre-justified, but that's just my personal view. – Tivedshambo (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ohh right, on that, i think the "v-d-e" or "edit" are vital to make Wikipedia editable by anyone, the whole purpose of this site. On the alignment, I'm somewhat undecided as to what works, but it was left align before so I'm trying not to rock the boat too much. Pickle 23:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice work - I like the new version. I would say that I prefer the left-aligned version, though. Fingerpuppet 08:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]